“Tested and Proven” doesn’t necessarily mean better
Let’s say a college professor who had been teaching calculus for many years wrote a calculus test for his class to take. And let’s say a 10 year old boy was given the test and managed to pass it. Would that “prove” that the 10 year old has more knowledge and ability in calculus than the professor because he passed the test and the professor hasn’t? Just because the professor hasn’t taken the test doesn’t mean he can’t get a better grade than his students. The professor hasn’t taken the test because he has no incentive to do so.
In a